reverse-skills-max: initial public release (restored, redacted, hardened)

This commit is contained in:
baradok609hecl1pq6qi
2026-10-20 02:17:15 +03:00
commit da24c2bd20
2227 changed files with 443931 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
---
name: competition-kernel-container-escape
description: Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for kernel attack surface, namespace and cgroup boundaries, container isolation assumptions, syscall paths, and escape primitive verification. Use when the user asks to analyze container-to-host escape paths, kernel exploit prerequisites, namespace crossover, capability misuse, or prove whether an exploit primitive crosses the sandbox boundary. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
---
# Competition Kernel Container Escape
Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` first.
Use this skill when the decisive step is proving a boundary crossing between containerized context and host or higher-privilege kernel context.
Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.
## Quick Start
1. Map runtime isolation first: namespaces, cgroups, seccomp, capabilities, LSM, and mount boundaries.
2. Separate exploit prerequisite, primitive, and boundary-crossing proof.
3. Record kernel version, config hints, runtime options, and reachable syscall surface.
4. Keep instrumented observations separate from pristine challenge path.
5. Reproduce one minimal primitive-to-boundary-crossing chain.
## Workflow
### 1. Map Isolation And Kernel Surface
- Record namespace map, cgroup mode, capabilities, seccomp profile, AppArmor or SELinux state, mounted filesystems, and runtime sockets.
- Note kernel version, distro build hints, module exposure, and container runtime behavior.
- Keep host and container observations linked to exact node and context.
### 2. Prove Exploit Primitive And Crossover
- Show controllable input, trigger condition, affected object, and observable kernel or runtime state change.
- Capture before and after identity, namespace, mount, or process visibility to prove boundary crossing.
- Distinguish crash-only behavior from stable capability gain.
### 3. Reduce To Decisive Escape Chain
- Compress to: prerequisite state -> primitive trigger -> boundary crossing evidence -> resulting host-level capability.
- State whether root cause is kernel vulnerability, runtime misconfiguration, capability overgrant, or namespace leak.
- If path relies mostly on credential replay after initial foothold, hand off to Linux credential pivot skill.
## Read This Reference
- Load `references/kernel-container-escape.md` for isolation checklist, primitive checklist, and parity guidance.
## What To Preserve
- Kernel and runtime context, capability set, seccomp or LSM state, and namespace map
- Primitive trigger data, boundary crossing evidence, and resulting capability
- One minimal reproducible chain from container context to host-relevant effect

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
interface:
display_name: "Competition Kernel Container Escape"
short_description: "Map kernel and container boundaries to prove escape primitives"
default_prompt: "After $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is active, use $competition-kernel-container-escape to map kernel and container boundaries and prove the decisive escape primitive."
policy:
allow_implicit_invocation: false

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
# Kernel Container Escape Checklist
## First Pass
- Kernel version, runtime type, namespace map, cgroup mode, capability set
- Seccomp profile, AppArmor or SELinux mode, mounts, privileged sockets
- Potential primitives: syscall path, fs boundary, runtime API, namespace leak
## Chain To Reconstruct
1. Isolation baseline recorded
2. Exploit or misconfig primitive triggered
3. Boundary crossover evidence captured
4. Host-relevant capability appears
5. Chain reproduces from reset baseline
## Evidence To Keep Together
- Context side: kernel and runtime config, namespace and capability state
- Primitive side: controllable input, trigger, affected object, observables
- Effect side: identity change, host visibility, privileged action, persistence edge
## Common Pitfalls
- Treating container root as host compromise without crossover proof
- Mixing several primitives before proving one decisive chain
- Claiming escape from crash artifacts without stable capability evidence