reverse-skills-max: initial public release (restored, redacted, hardened)

research-what-we-did/Deep-Research-skills/tests/test_install_codex.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+set -euo pipefail
+
+ROOT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/.." && pwd)"
+TMP_HOME="$(mktemp -d)"
+trap 'rm -rf "$TMP_HOME"' EXIT
+
+assert_contains() {
+  local path="$1"
+  local expected="$2"
+  if ! rg -F "$expected" "$path" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+    echo "expected '$expected' in $path" >&2
+    exit 1
+  fi
+}
+
+HOME="$TMP_HOME" bash "$ROOT_DIR/scripts/install-codex.sh"
+HOME="$TMP_HOME" bash "$ROOT_DIR/scripts/install-codex.sh"
+
+if [[ ! -f "$TMP_HOME/.codex/config.toml" ]]; then
+  echo "expected config.toml to exist" >&2
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+if [[ -d "$TMP_HOME/.codex/skills" ]]; then
+  echo "did not expect skills directory to be created" >&2
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+if [[ -d "$TMP_HOME/.codex/agents" ]]; then
+  echo "did not expect agents directory to be created" >&2
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+assert_contains "$TMP_HOME/.codex/config.toml" "multi_agent = true"
+assert_contains "$TMP_HOME/.codex/config.toml" "default_mode_request_user_input = true"
+assert_contains "$TMP_HOME/.codex/config.toml" "suppress_unstable_features_warning = true"
+assert_contains "$TMP_HOME/.codex/config.toml" "[agents.web_researcher]"
+assert_contains "$TMP_HOME/.codex/config.toml" 'config_file = "agents/web-researcher.toml"'
+
+if [[ "$(rg -c '^\[features\]$' "$TMP_HOME/.codex/config.toml")" != "1" ]]; then
+  echo "expected exactly one [features] section" >&2
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+if [[ "$(rg -c '^\[agents\.web_researcher\]$' "$TMP_HOME/.codex/config.toml")" != "1" ]]; then
+  echo "expected exactly one [agents.web_researcher] section" >&2
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+if awk '
+  /^\[features\]$/ { in_features=1; next }
+  /^\[/ { in_features=0 }
+  in_features && /suppress_unstable_features_warning/
+' "$TMP_HOME/.codex/config.toml" | grep -q .; then
+  echo "did not expect suppress_unstable_features_warning inside [features]" >&2
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+echo "install-codex test passed"

research-what-we-did/Deep-Research-skills/tests/test_validate_json_schemas.py

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
+"""Regression test for skills/*/research/validate_json.py.
+
+The validator accepts EXACTLY ONE schema — the one /research actually emits:
+
+    fields:
+      <category>:
+        - {name: ..., description: ..., detail_level: ...}
+    uncertain: []
+
+Any other shape must be rejected (exit 1), never silently pass with zero fields.
+With no explicit `required:` markers, every field is required so incomplete coverage
+actually fails. With explicit markers, opt-in semantics are preserved.
+
+Run:  python tests/test_validate_json_schemas.py   (exit 0 = all pass)
+"""
+import importlib.util
+import json
+import subprocess
+import sys
+import tempfile
+from pathlib import Path
+
+ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
+COPIES = sorted(ROOT.glob("skills/*/research/validate_json.py"))
+
+tmp = Path(tempfile.mkdtemp())
+# The one accepted schema: fields:{<category>:[{name, detail_level}]} with NO `required` markers.
+(tmp / "good_schema.yaml").write_text(
+    "fields:\n"
+    "  basic:\n"
+    "    - {name: a, detail_level: detailed}\n"
+    "    - {name: b, detail_level: brief}\n"
+    "    - {name: c, detail_level: moderate}\n"
+    "    - {name: d, detail_level: moderate}\n"
+    "uncertain: []\n", encoding="utf-8")
+# Same shape but with explicit required markers -> opt-in semantics.
+(tmp / "marked_schema.yaml").write_text(
+    "fields:\n"
+    "  basic:\n"
+    "    - {name: a, required: true}\n"
+    "    - {name: b, required: true}\n"
+    "    - {name: notes, required: false}\n", encoding="utf-8")
+# A rejected shape: the old `field_categories:` form.
+(tmp / "bad_schema.yaml").write_text(
+    "field_categories:\n"
+    "  - category: basic\n"
+    "    fields:\n"
+    "      - {name: a}\n", encoding="utf-8")
+(tmp / "good.json").write_text(json.dumps({"a": 1, "b": 1, "c": 1, "d": 1}), encoding="utf-8")
+(tmp / "bad.json").write_text(json.dumps({"a": 1, "b": 1, "c": 1}), encoding="utf-8")  # missing 'd'
+
+
+def load(path, i):
+    spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(f"vj{i}", path)
+    mod = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
+    spec.loader.exec_module(mod)
+    return mod
+
+
+fails = []
+def check(label, cond):
+    print(("PASS " if cond else "FAIL ") + label)
+    if not cond:
+        fails.append(label)
+
+
+assert COPIES, "no validate_json.py copies found under skills/*/research/"
+for i, path in enumerate(COPIES):
+    tag = path.relative_to(ROOT).parts[1]  # e.g. research-en
+    m = load(path, i)
+
+    # 1. The one accepted schema parses all 4 fields; all required (no markers).
+    a, r, _ = m.load_fields_yaml(tmp / "good_schema.yaml")
+    check(f"[{tag}] good_schema parses 4 fields (was 0 before fix)", a == {"a", "b", "c", "d"})
+    check(f"[{tag}] all required when unmarked (no vacuous pass)", r == a)
+
+    # 2. Explicit markers preserve opt-in semantics.
+    am, rm, _ = m.load_fields_yaml(tmp / "marked_schema.yaml")
+    check(f"[{tag}] marked_schema: 3 fields, 'notes' optional", am == {"a", "b", "notes"} and rm == {"a", "b"})
+
+    # 3. A complete JSON passes; a JSON missing a field actually fails.
+    good = m.validate_json(tmp / "good.json", a, r, _)
+    bad = m.validate_json(tmp / "bad.json", a, r, _)
+    check(f"[{tag}] good.json -> valid", good["valid"])
+    check(f"[{tag}] bad.json  -> INVALID (catches missing 'd')", (not bad["valid"]) and "d" in bad["missing_required"])
+
+    # 4. A rejected schema shape must make the CLI exit non-zero (run as subprocess).
+    proc = subprocess.run([sys.executable, str(path), "-f", str(tmp / "bad_schema.yaml"), "-d", str(tmp)],
+                          capture_output=True, text=True)
+    check(f"[{tag}] bad_schema (field_categories) is REJECTED (exit != 0)", proc.returncode != 0)
+
+print("\nRESULT:", "ALL PASS" if not fails else f"{len(fails)} FAILED -> {fails}")
+sys.exit(1 if fails else 0)